If Lithuania ratifies this change, the next constraint is physical infrastructure — hardened storage, command-and-control links, and air defense integration with the Spyder systems Romania just procured. That construction takes 24-36 months minimum and requires NATO standardization agreements that don't yet exist for Baltic nuclear basing. The real pressure point is Germany: Berlin's veto on nuclear forward-deployment in the Cold War is now a historical artifact, but the domestic political cost of hosting or enabling Baltic warhead infrastructure may force Scholz's successor to choose between alliance cohesion and SPD electoral survival in 2027.
This forces NATO's nuclear posture committee to resolve whether tactical warheads deploy to the Baltic before or after ratification — a timeline that determines whether Lithuania's deterrent window closes or opens.
The constitutional lift itself takes 12-18 months through referendum, but the political agreement signals that Vilnius is willing to absorb domestic political cost to close a perceived deterrence gap against Russia. Watch whether Poland, Estonia, or Latvia follow with similar constitutional amendments in the next 90 days; a cascade would force Brussels to formally allocate warhead custody and storage, which currently exists only in declaratory form for the Baltic region.
Has NATO's Nuclear Planning Group already modeled deployment timelines for a Lithuania-hosted warhead posture, or is this constitutional move ahead of alliance planning?
Strategic intelligence, synthesized daily — with a public track record. Every call graded against what actually happened.