The proxy cutoff is the sharper constraint. If Hezbollah's drone-and-missile cadence against Israel drops by 40%+ in the next quarter, it confirms Iran's logistics network is genuinely severed—not just degraded. That would be the first hard evidence that the Hormuz strikes (May 8) inflicted lasting supply-chain damage beyond the naval fleet itself.
Conversely, if Houthi anti-ship missile launches hold steady or accelerate, it signals Iran has pre-positioned enough inventory or found alternative supply routes (likely through Oman or UAE proxies) to sustain proxy operations independently of the main supply apparatus.
The distinction matters for CENTCOM's threat assessment: a proxy force operating on stored inventory is predictable and finite; one with active resupply is indefinite.
Cooper's testimony collapses the timeline for Iranian naval reconstitution, which directly constrains CENTCOM's force-posture planning for the Strait of Hormuz beyond the current escort rotation.
If the 5-10 year rebuild holds, the swarm-boat blockade now underway (per May 12-14 signals) represents Iran's operational ceiling for the medium term—not a temporary tactic pending fleet restoration. This means the U.S. Navy and allies (UK, Australia, Japan) are now planning for sustained small-boat harassment, not a return to conventional naval competition.
The proxy supply cutoff is more time-sensitive: if Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Houthis remain isolated from Iranian logistics for 12+ months, their operational tempo will degrade measurably. Watch the Houthi Red Sea strike frequency over the next 90 days—a sharp drop signals the supply constraint is real; sustained attacks suggest Iran found workarounds.
Does Cooper's 5-10 year estimate account for Iran's domestic shipbuilding capacity (yards like Bandar Abbas), or is it premised on Iran's inability to source advanced components from external suppliers?
Strategic intelligence, synthesized daily — with a public track record. Every call graded against what actually happened.